CO129-139 - Sir MacDonnell - 1869 [8-12] — Page 595

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next

In the Supreme Court of Hong Kong

The Queen

1140

In 104586

against Charles, Abraham Saint

The Chief Justice having after his Judgment was delivered made a verbal statement which left room for further discussion as to the liability of the Crown to pay, and the right of the Defendant to recover costs in this case, and the question having been reopened in Chambers, it appears to the Attorney General, and to the Counsel for the Defendant, desirable to avoid further discussion and expense if possible. Therefore, as it is not intended further to prosecute the Appeal to the Privy

Edit History

2026-05-20 07:59:44 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
In the Supreme Court of Hong Kong The Queen 1140 In 104586 against Charles, Abraham Saint The Chief Justice having after his Judgment was delivered made a verbal statement which left room for further discussion as to the liability of the Crown to pay, and the right of the Defendant to recover costs in this case, and the question having been reopened in Chambers, it appears to the Attorney General, and to the Counsel for the Defendant, desirable to avoid further discussion and expense if possible. Therefore, as it is not intended further to prosecute the Appeal to the Privy
Baseline (Original)
Copy) In the Supreme Court of Hong Kong The Queen 1140 In 104586 against Charles, Abraham Saint The Chief Justice having after his Judgment was delivered made a verbal statement which left room for further discussion as to the liability of the known to pay, and the right of the Defendant to recover costo in this case, and the question having bun repened Chambers, it appears to the Attorney General, and to the Counsel for the Defendant, desirable to avoid further discussion and expense if posible. therefore, as it is not intended further to prosecute the Appeal to the Privy
2026-05-20 07:59:44 · Baseline
View content

Copy)

In the Supreme Court of Hong Kong

The Queen

1140

In 104586

against Charles, Abraham Saint

The Chief Justice having after his

Judgment

was

delivered made a verbal

statement which left room for further

discussion as to the liability of the known to pay, and the right of the Defendant to recover costo in this case, and the question having bun repened

Chambers, it appears to the Attorney General, and to the Counsel for the Defendant, desirable to avoid further discussion and expense if posible. therefore, as it is not intended further to prosecute the Appeal to the Privy

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.